Informationskrieger USA: Was nicht passt, wird passend gemacht

In einem „für sie günstigen Format“, so der US-Publizist Robert Parry, würden die USA die nachrichtendienstlichen Daten zum Absturz der MH 17 präsentieren. „Das Gleiche war auch vor dem Irak-Krieg gewesen“, schrieb Parry am Mittwoch in einer Stellungnahme zum jüngsten Beitrag der „Los Angeles Times“. Er spricht von einem „Informationskrieg“.

Von Andreas Beck

Die LA Times hatte dabei einen anonymen Geheimdienstler bemüht, der berichtet hatte, die Rakete eines „Buk“-Luftabwehrkomplexes hätte von einem desertierten ukrainischen Militär abgefeuert werden können. „Der Bericht über einen eventuellen Deserteur erklärt, dass Fachleute Soldaten in ukrainischer Uniform gesehen haben, die die betroffene Raketenbatterie in der Ostukraine bedienten“, fuhr Parry in seinem auf dem Internetportal consortiumnews.com veröffentlichten Beitrag fort.

Er bietet für den Abschuss auch eine Variante an: „Aber es gibt auch eine andere offenkundige Erklärung, welche die US-amerikanische Spionage jedoch nicht akzeptieren will: Die Rakete sei von einem Angehörigen der ukrainischen Armee gestartet. Somit haben wir ein weiteres Mal mit dem Fall zu tun, dass die US-Behörden nachrichtendienstliche Daten an das ihnen genehme Resultat anpassen“, hieß es in Parrys Beitrag. „Das, was die Obama-Administration und die meisten führenden Medien präsentierten, ist ein weiteres Beispiel für einen Informationskrieg. Das ist ein Versuch, den Gegner trotz allen Belegen anzuschwärzen und alle zu marginalisieren, die mit diesem Schluss nicht einverstanden sind. Das gleiche Gruppendenken hatte seinerzeit die verderbliche Irak-Invasion durch die USA zur Folge. Es liegt klar auf der Hand, dass daraus keine Lehren gezogen wurden“, schrieb Parry.

Inzwischen verliert die amerikanische Propaganda völlig an Glaubwürdigkeit. Zu der Theorie ein ukrainisches Kampfflugzeug des Typs Su-25 habe die Passagiermaschine mit einer Luft-Luft-Rakete abgeschossen“, hieß es: „Wir sind der Ansicht, dass ein solcher Angriff nicht möglich ist. Auf Fotos von der Absturzstelle sind Beschädigungen zu sehen, die eine Boden-Luft-Rakete verursachen konnte.“ Man fragt sich natürlich, wie die US-Politiker an Hand von Bildern die Schäden an dem Wrack analysieren können, wozu die Fachleute die ganzen Reste zuerst zusammensetzten und zudem chemisch untersuchen müssen. Außerdem hätten die ukrainischen Buk-Luftabwehrsysteme die Maschine nicht abschiessen können, weil „sie sich außerhalb der Reichweite befanden“, hieß es. Den Raketen, die die Milizen haben, wäre das aber möglich gewesen?

Wer den Informationskrieg so führt, ist dumm, arrogant oder in Panik, vielleicht alles zusammen.

Loading...
Spread the love
Lesen Sie auch:  Zarif zu Trump: Es gibt nichts wie gute Kriege, schlechte Kriege

Wir brauchen ihre Unterstützung!

Liebe Leser, wenn Sie keine Premiumartikel lesen möchten, aber uns dennoch unterstützen wollen, dann können sie das auch mit einer Spende auf unser Bankkonto tun. Fragen Sie per eMail: [email protected] nach den Bankdaten oder übersenden Sie einen Unterstützungsbeitrag einfach per Paypal. Danke für Ihre Hilfe!

Loading...

2 Kommentare

  1. Die amerikanische Regierung, benötigt ganz dringend einen Krieg.Also ist das anzuwenden was die Bürger Amerikas glauben. Da dies schon seit Jahrzehnten funktioniert, von Tomkin bis heute, wird das auch nichts daran geändert.Bei Staaten wie Vietnam, Irak und ähnlichen konnte dies funktionieren da diese sich auch kaum wehren konnten gegen die Anschuldigungen. Bei Russland werden die abstrusen Anschuldigungen nicht funktionieren. Zudem wird der vernunftbegabte Bürger eines Landes sich nicht wie ein Schaf auf die Schlachtbank führen lassen.

  2. Analysis Novorossia

    Sensation or intelligence operations?

    Yesterday, quarter past twelve   | Category: Analysis , Editor's Note

     

    ·                                                                                                                                                        80

    ·          1

    ·          2

    ·          3

    ·          4

    ·          5

    Views: 32069

     

    On July 24, Colonel Victor Baranets appeared very entertaining entry: "In a telephone conversation with Obama Poroshenko admitted that Boeing Ukrainian air defense shot down," and finished off the SU-25 ".."http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/2125404/ post331795866 /

    With very mixed reputation Baranets Colonel, I must admit that though he is a former (and former does not happen) Head of Information and Analytical Department of Ministry of Defense, but knows a lot of operational combinations, very informed person and just do nothing.

    If he voiced similar things, as discussed in a Soviet cartoon, "This zhzhzh ulterior motive" .

    Last night one of the staff unit of government of Ukraine for $ 1 million sold a correspondent of one of the news agencies in Germany to record phone conversations between U.S. and Ukraine, which took place on July 22 at 18-53 -19-12 European time. The recording was transferred to Berlin, on the content of it was immediately informed Merkel. She ordered "under any conditions, the content of this talk in the media not to disclose."However, one officer of the German secret services (presumably working on Poland) managed to pass the transcript of the conversation Poroshenko-Obama in Warsaw, where it feeds through undercover and became known to Russian intelligence. Transcript of a very long, because cite only one of the fragments:

    Poroshenko : – Barack, I am surprised and upset your inconsistency in reporting the causes of the destruction of the Boeing … That We point you to the separatists, then to Moscow, then suddenly declare that the evidence of her involvement in this case is not … We're with outset agreed to stick to one position … But if you continue to make such statements, it will be difficult to resist the Moscow …
    Obama : – Easy, Peter. You apparently misunderstood the nature of our applications … We say "unavailable" … But a lot of work on it … But now you have to work a lot more to … to … to … all it looked plausible as possible … You made ​​a big mistake by sending this very … Russian warplane … got him … And now you, and we will be very difficult obyasnit world … why this was necessary. ..
    Poroshenko : – We did not have confidence that the ground we will succeed … I had to check … and err …
    Obama : – I understand, I understand … But it's not included in our understanding of the pattern of events … And now at the hands of Russian have another trump card …
    Poroshenko : – As it happened, how it happened …
    Obama : – Peter, you see, what happened … This is bad … I mean that your plane that flew after us … This adds a lot of trouble …
    Poroshenko : – We both denied everything, and will deny … The main thing to you, it has not tripped up by these strange statements about his innocence Russian … You and I should not diverge in this … Otherwise it will be difficult …
    Obama : – We will support you in everything … We are sailing in the same boat … Do not hesitate … Although you have completed our overall plan procrastination … It had to happen a little earlier …
    Poroshenko : – But you are well aware of the level of training of our specialists …
    Obama : – I am concerned that some of these most experts do not spill the beans … Russian probably already hunting them … Try to save those of his people … If they open your mouth …
    Poroshenko : – I understand … We will make sure that they never open my mouth …
    Obama : – You need to tightly control all svidelstvo and witnesses … It can ruin our whole party …
    Poroshenko : – And what's with the black boxes? … I sent to England to their experts … they worked in contact with the British … But Russian also require access to these tape recorders or whatever … This is very dangerous and for us, for you … Russian and close there should not be … Otherwise …
    Obama : – I have already spoken on this matter with Cameron … Everything will be okay … His people will do anything wrong "…

    I will not discuss whether it's true or false, disinformation. I will try to analyze the goals that can be achieved by this publication.

    First visible targets that have already been achieved by the fact of publication, regardless of the veracity of the facts cited in it.
    1. Baranez leads a specific date and time of the conversation between Obama and Poroshenko. So this conversation was. And make it clear to the West that Russia is aware of the fact that conversation and can prove it.

    2. Officer Government Communications Ukraine allegedly sold for $ 1 million record the conversation to a certain German news agencies. It discredits Ukraine Poroshenko, showing all the leaders that "secret" talks with President of Ukraine are not secret, and any "confidential" talks at any time may become a thing of the world community. With Ukraine deal impossible . Baranets calls and the amount thus giving to understand that this information it directly from the source, since it is not necessary that the amount mentioned in the further dissemination chain until it "flow." In this case, the amount of the purchase does not have this information for consumers no value compared to the information itself. That is, Baranez makes it clear that Russia was still known to "leak" disk imaging from Germany and Poland.

    3. Merkel ordered "under any circumstances, the content of this talk in the media not to disclose." That is, the German Chancellor can ORDER any "independent" news agencies in Germany. This fact discredits itself as Merkel, and the entire western "democracy" with its "independent press, freedom of speech and so on." Baranez simultaneously makes it clear that Russia again all know what's going on in the higher echelons of power in Germany and without "sources in Poland."

    4. Officer German secret service, "working for Poland", passed the information to Warsaw. This Baranez disavows its source in Germany. In addition, in Germany now recruiting scandal erupted with German officials Americans. Coupled with the fact that the "closest ally" listens to all the phone calls the highest officials of Germany, refuses to return to the gold reserves and generally behaves with Germany as an occupied country with the third world, this infa can splash in kerosinchiku so special relationship with the United States of Germany. Any such information leak from Germany to the U.S. (and a staunch ally Poland Americans) can blow up German society from the Parliament, to ordinary citizens. Germany – Russia's key partner, and any disagreement with the U.S. throws her in our arms.

    5. That leak in Russia, according to Baranets occurred precisely in Poland, killing three birds with one stone: disavows the possibility of Russian intelligence in Germany, Poland substitutes as a source for any disk imaging Russia and NATO makes clear that all of them " secrets "for Russia – no secrets. 

    And another very interesting observation. This information is not available widely in the media. Silent television, print media, too, the blogosphere about it almost does not know. If the information is true, then the power in Russia made it clear to the West that at any moment, these facts can be widely reported and presented. If the information is false, then Russia reserves itself room to maneuver, saying in the case of force majeure, that is – an initiative of the private person retired colonel, and the state is not liable for the actions of individuals.
    In any case, Russia has a huge room for maneuver in any direction.

    Now, Khodakovsky.

    It traces another operative combination. I have to say, I believe that Alexander – the hero of New Russia and honestly fighting for independence with the junta.
    But, it is both the most controversial figure in the leadership of the DNI, complicit in all the scandals, "betrayal", games of various political and oligarchic forces in Ukraine and Russia. Khodakovsky – ideal figure for various operational transactions at any level. He – the former commander of the "Alpha" Donetsk region of Ukraine, a former security minister DNR, the commander of the battalion "Vostok". By definition – a man not stupid, many knowledgeable, able to analyze and feeling in any operational transactions, like a fish in water. Besides, he – the perfect person to carry out such operations as Donetsk Republic and Russia. Therefore, any word of his interviews, or deed must be considered from the standpoint of ongoing information war . Many consider him a traitor, a man of Akhmetov, etc. So it is necessary to think so. This gives him room to maneuver. Khodakovsky not go to any comparison with another controversial rebel leader – Kozitsin. Compare them – it's like comparing a peacock and wise eagle Sori for the digression.
    Therefore, binding and Khodakovskogo agency Reuters to this conversation the first U.S. officials and Ukraine – also part of the probable mnogohodovki. Maybe soon we will know to what. And can not know. In any case, this article Colonel Baranets not as simple as it seems at first glance, and is not published to our "sofa experts" in the virtual exercise at their own ambitions, omniscience and swearing.

    This zhzhzh ulterior motive!

    Alexander Nikishin 
    Central News Agency Novorossia 
    Novorus.info 

Kommentar hinterlassen

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht.